I need your suggestion on below scenario.
I am planning to venture into one internet startup. Its a niche domain.
I have worked in the domain and understand the domain well. I have studied the domain and developed the solution which can reduce the flaw in the process. I have network within the industry. I have worked on initial business plan, executive summary, phase wise product implementation plan. I have designed and developed software product framework for the first phase and developed and designed few components for the same. The partners who are going to join me do not have any knowledge on the given domain but are very good at technical side.
At this initial stage, it is not decided who will stay and help me till what time, as everyone's priority changes, I suggested them two options.
1 I suggested to not to decide the percentage of partnership upfront based on arbitrary numbers.
But I suggested them to use equity sharing. In that, we will have 100% equity (or 100 shares) allocated at one place and then everyone will have to earn the equity (no upfront allocation) by completing their tasks and that way only one will grow his share or earn equity.
For this we, as a team, will need to assign "Value" for each task which is part of our long term plan and we will consider Time, Value and Money allocation by each partner against total time and money estimation for complete project.
Now in this case I am confused at few points.
1.1 Should I, as I have developed and worked for almost 1 year to develop this concept, assign 100% to myself and then slowly give it to each partner based on equity they earn based on their participation in all tasks.
1.2 Or should I take certain equity initially based on work I have already done when we all start together, say X%, and handle remaining equity and assign to all of us based on our work. As I dont want to assign equity upfront to people who join me arbitrarily withouth their ability and contribution. Also in this, where should I assign the remaining equity?
Also let me know if this is right approach. If so how to decide X% value?
Downside is that, this approach is very time consuming.
2 To go with upfront numbers. In this case, I will assign say 10% to myself initially and then remaining 90% will be divided between all the partners. Thus I will have certain more percentage compared to others.
Is this a right approach?
If not above then, please let me know what is the right approach to address this partnership issue?
Appreciate your time and help.
Thanks and best regards
It sounds like you're trying to reinvent something which has already been invented, called vesting.
For tax reasons you don't want to be giving people additional equity as time goes on. Right now, your company is not worth very much, so when you give someone a lot of equity, there is no tax implication. However next year your company may be worth quite a bit and when you give them equity they will have to treat it as income and pay income tax on it, even though the shares you gave them are not liquid.
Instead you divide up the shares at the beginning when they're worthless, but you maintain the right to buy back any shares at a trivial price if people don't stay in the company.
For a typical example, a five-founder company might split the equity given each founder 20%, but vesting over four years. If one founder leaves after only two years, half of that founder's shares would be returned to the company.
This is extremely common; it is the only reasonable way to prevent a co-founder from quitting after two months and owning a large chunk of the company for a tiny amount of work.
If one founder (such as yourself) had already been working for a while you might simply accelerate the vesting for that person. So if you had been working for a year when you brought on the other people, you might agree that your shares are already 25% vested so you only have 3 more years of work to fully vest, while the other new cofounders have to work for 4 more years to earn all their shares.