Subsidiary or Branch Abroad?


0

I've found a question that I found interesting, and would like some feedback as to what you all think..... Back-story: A web-based company wants to operate in foreign country to increase sales and hire employees native to the foreign country.

When would a company want to incorporate in a foreign country as a subsidiary versus just registering a branch? One is a separate legal entity and the other is directly related to the parent.

What are some Pros/Cons of each? Like their ability to conduct business (sales, hiring, etc..) in the foreign country? Taxation? Transferability of assets? Permanency? Other variables?

I will suggest that the parent/initial company is in the U.S. and is trying to decide what to do about setting up in the U.K., I hope this will give the question some bearing and level of specificity.

Incorporation Foreign

asked Nov 26 '09 at 04:09
Blank
Nbeecroft
515 points
  • Where is the company in the US registered at? Which state? – James Black 10 years ago
  • Let's say Delaware as it seems to be the most conducive towards international business. – Nbeecroft 10 years ago

1 Answer


1

There are several issues to consider here and some vary country by country but you will actually find that there are more similarities than differences.

You will find that from the perspective of actually running your business using a branch vs. a subsidiary does not make that much difference. Both can hire people, have sales, can be permanent, etc.

The main differences I've found (and this is for a software company so it could be different for a hardware company) are:

  • if you do a branch office you many countries will make you file the parents financial statements as public record. This is required in the UK, France, Finland but not in Japan so it is country specific. This may not sound like a big deal unless you have competitors that would very much like to see your financials and use them against you. If you have a subsidiary then you will only publish the books of the sub.
  • a branch may not have liability protection for the parent and it will be easier for someone in the foreign country to come after the parent for bills or other legal remedies.

The main issue you have with operating in another country is whether you have created a permanent establishment (PE). If the parent creates a PE in a country then that countries tax authority can look at the parents books and try to allocate how much of the profit of the parent they think belongs in their country and therefore how much tax you can pay. As you can imagine it can be quite hard to have foreign tax authorities going through your US books.

Because of this the primary goal in having a foreign entity is to NOT create a PE in that country. This requires you to place some limitations on that entity such as limiting what authority the entity has to negotiate contracts. Most of these limitations are pretty easy to work around.

If you do not create a PE then the subsidiary or branch will just keep it's own books and will determine how much tax it will pay based on it's books.

A document I found that explains more on PE's is:

answered Nov 26 '09 at 16:52
Blank
Dane
1,866 points
  • Thanks for the response! I found it very interesting; the main point I took away is to avoid having a PE so as not to complicate international tax issues. One of the things I am going to research is what about setting up a completely separate legal entity, and transferring I.P. etc, if most of the businesses operations are going to be carried out in the foreign country? (Basically only leave the original company in the U.S. in case you want to return to the U.S..) – Nbeecroft 10 years ago
  • So we have looked at that also. Many companies more IP around to countries with lower tax rates and license it back. Beyond taxes though if different locations are developing the same product it makes a ton of sense to centralize the IP to simplify things. Right now we develop our IP in two countries and can't move it because we get government research grants that want the IP to stay in the country and it's a huge pain to come up with acceptable cross licensing agreements that make everyone happy. – Dane 10 years ago

Your Answer

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • • Bullets
  • 1. Numbers
  • Quote
Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own question or browse other questions in these topics:

Incorporation Foreign