I am the sole founder and owner of a limited company.
I am considering to find an angel investor not only for financial reasons but also to have somebody experienced to give valuable input - therefore I would like to have the investor as non-executive director so that he/she will seat on the board and have regular meetings with me.
Does that make sense?
If so, my question (probably silly, sorry!) is, how will that decrease my control over the company, assuming the investor will get something around 10 or 20% equity?
I read decisions in the board are taken based on a raise of hands. Being just 2 person-board, does that mean I can't take any board decision without his/her approval, despite me being the majority shareholder? Will I need to address that in the term sheet? Should I use supermajority or veto rules?
Or, if I want to keep the control, I shouldn't give them a seat in the board, but just make them "join the conversation" as mentors or advisors?
Apart from that, in what other ways my control will be diminished?
I would doubt that an angel investment would upset your majority status - esp. since you are a sole founder (and you haven't disclosed any other shareholder owners) .
Sounds like you are looking for an advisor, and not a board member.
You can add an advisor to your board, but your bylaws / articles of incorporation must define what their voting rights are (or are not) if you do not want the advisor to have the default rights that apply to all board members. If they are only an advisor, their exposure is also minimized - but IANAL, so I suggest you have a chat with your lawyer.
There a quite a few levels of involvement an angel can have - you need to understand up front what type best suits your (and her / his) goals.
Additional relevant info on this topic can be found here.
Your level of control will be determined by the mechanisms you use in your contract.
For example, you could issue your investor with Preference shares:
preferred stock: stock whose holders are guaranteed priority in the payment of dividends but whose holders have no voting rights.It's Mechanisms like these that will help you strike a balance with your potential investors - it all depends on how much the investor trusts you with his/her money, what(/when) (s)he is looking to get out of his/her investment and how much time and effort (s)he is willing to put in to your company.
When it comes to selling your company there are also other things to look at, like "drag along rights" which enables a majority shareholder to force a minority shareholder to join in on the same of the company.
So overall you can see there are a number of ways to ensure you have the control you desire, while still keeping all parties happy. However quite often you will find that the investor wants to lay down the initial terms and conditions and you may need to make compromises, depending on your situation. Also when looking for investors, don't jump right with the first person who is willing to part with their money. Excuse the bad analogy, but think of it as a kind of marriage, (s)he may be pretty, funny, <>... but that doesn't mean they are the right fit for you or your company.