When a huge company copies your startup


8

What do you do when a huge online company (as dominant as say Google, Apple, Microsoft etc in their respective niche) has a big feature that's been lacking in their very popular product, and your startup is based on this missing feature, but the big guys decided to add this feature to their product?

Getting Started Marketing Ideas Development Website

asked Nov 5 '12 at 23:57
Blank
Nyxynyx
193 points
Top digital marketing agency for SEO, content marketing, and PR: Demand Roll
  • See how dropbox is competing with googledrive and skydrive – Disconnect25 11 years ago

2 Answers


8

It's usually not a good strategy to build a startup based on the "missing feature" of a huge company's product because what's happening to you now is what I think always happens. Big companies pay a few guys in a room to watch the market, detect opportunities early, and particularly to monitor startups that are building the "missing feature".

So if you fail, you'll have learned a lesson: don't do "missing feature" startups! Bad business strategy in my opinion.

As for trying to differentiate yourself based on pricing/service/new features/execution, I think it will not work. It works when you're competing against other startups; that's when execution makes the difference and that's where the "missing feature" strategy works. In your case, the bigger company probably has an established customer base and a significant marketing budget; the network effect and branding carry a huge weight in customers' buying decision. You'll fight hard but as time goes on, you'll start to lose confidence because you won't be moving the needle much. And in the end, guess what will happen.

Now, since you've already got a running business with a team in place, you could try to innovate and create a new business altogether, or you can continue fighting the mountain. Your choice. Big companies have the advantage of easily adding the "missing features" and startups have the advantage of easily shifting business models; play where you're strong.

Good luck.

answered Nov 6 '12 at 04:08
Blank
Frenchie
4,166 points
  • resharper is using that strategy and microsoft for some reason did not crush them. – I Adapter 11 years ago
  • yes, you're right; Microsoft probably had a good reason not to. There are always going to be general rules and there are always going to be exceptions to everything. Overall, I think you're better off choosing a business strategy where the odds are in your favor don't you think? – Frenchie 11 years ago
  • I agree, however if you have a good idea (about plugin), maybe you should try it ;) I think there are two reasons why resharper has succeeded: 1) everybody loves it(even devs at Microsoft) 2) its a lot of work to reimplement it. – I Adapter 11 years ago
  • "devs at microsoft love it" is probably the worst place to be. They can justify developing their own version as cost-saving by not having to buy reshaper and there is ego, should MSFT devs really have to rely on outside stuff? – Mgb 11 years ago

4

Just like we've seen with the smartphone wars, ideas are pretty common, it's the execution of those ideas that makes the difference between iOS, Android, and Windows Phone 7. You need to figure out how to execute in a way that plays to your strengths as a small, lean company.

You can throw in the towel or you can fight back. However, you can't go toe-to-toe with the big guys. This means you can't charge the same price for the same service, and legal action, even if you have a patent, is probably out because you don't have the deep pockets to see it through.

But you can fight back asymmetrically. If the features and/or functionality are the exact same, differentiate yourself in other ways. Maybe by charging less, maybe by providing better customer service, maybe by adding features more quickly. If the features and/or functionality are different in a valuable way (or you can figure out what to add to make it different in a valuable way), then play up that feature. Regardless of what you do, pick a course of action that plays to your strengths as a small company.

answered Nov 6 '12 at 01:06
Blank
Robbie
62 points
  • Great answer! Big companies can rarely be as agile as small ones, so that's how you win. – Steve Jones 11 years ago
  • I totally disagree: you can win with better execution when you're competing against other startups, but not when you're competing against an 800-pound gorilla. – Frenchie 11 years ago
  • It depends on the specifics of the situation and by what you mean by "better execution". Can you offer a better polished version of the same feature set as the 800 lb gorilla and expect to succeed? Probably not. Can you identify a niche audience that is too small to be worth the 800 lb gorilla's time and tweak your idea to serve them? Sure. It all comes down to the question "is there a difference between what I offer and they offer that customers care about and that allows me a profit?" – Robbie 11 years ago
  • Legal action should never be off the table in a patent dispute. What would you issue a patent for if you give up on it so quickly? Once going into the fight however, you must take into the account the possibility of the patent being invalidated, but as long as its valid - you should fight to enforce it. Just by not enforcing it you invalidate it yourself. – Littleadv 11 years ago

Your Answer

  • Bold
  • Italic
  • • Bullets
  • 1. Numbers
  • Quote
Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own question or browse other questions in these topics:

Getting Started Marketing Ideas Development Website